This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document




Download 1.19 Mb.
NameThis Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document
page4/14
A typeDocumentation
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   14

exhibit 2-2 Tools To Assess pain level (continued)


Tool

strength

Weakness

Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

• Easy to use, but must be pre­

sented carefully
• Precise
• Sensitive to ethnic differences
• Easily translated across cul­

tures and languages
• Some evidence that a hori­ zontal line may be better than a vertical (“thermometer”) orientation

• Visual impairment may affect accuracy

• Can be time consuming to score, unless mechanical or computerized VAS tools are used

• Low completion rate in patients with cognitive impairments

• Difficult to administer to patients with cognitive impairments

• Cannot be administered by phone or email

• Subject to measurement error

Bird, 2003; Brunton, 2004.


exhibit 2-3 Tools To Assess several Dimensions of pain


Tool

strength

Weakness

Brief Pain Inventory

• Short form better for clinical practice

• Fairly easy to use
• Useful in different cultures
• Translated into and validated in several languages

• Not easily used with patients with cognitive impairments

McGill Pain Questionnaire

• Short form easier to administer

• Extensively studied

• Measures pain affect
• Not appropriate for patients with cognitive impairments

• Translation complicated
• Meaning of pain descriptors may vary across racial and ethnic groups

Department of Veterans Affairs & Department of Defense, 2003.



Assessing Substance Use and Addiction

As with assessing pain and function, assessing patient self-reports of substance use, whether via interviews or structured self-report

questionnaires, should be corroborated by other sources of information (e.g., medical records, interviews with family, urine toxicol- ogy, information from State prescription mon­ itoring programs) (Katz & Fanciullo, 2002).


18

2—Patient Assessment


exhibit 2-4 Tools To Assess pain Interference With life Activities and Functional capacities


Tool

purpose

Katz Basic Activities of Daily Living Scale

Rates independence by assessing six areas of daily activities

Pain Disability Index

Measures chronic pain and chronic pain interference in daily life

Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

Measures perceived disability from low back pain

WOMAC Index

Assesses pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with osteoarthritis


When initiating a conversation about alcohol

and drug use, clinicians should:
• Approach the topic matter-of-factly, handling it as part of the overall medical history.

• Incorporate questions about drug and alcohol use into a general behavioral health inventory including discussion of other lifestyle behaviors (e.g., diet, exercise).

• Ask about nicotine and caffeine use; questions about use of these substances provide opportunities to move to assess­ ment of other substances, beginning with alcohol, the most commonly abused substance.

• Assure patients that honest answers to questions of substance use are necessary to developing a treatment plan and that their responses will remain confidential.
A good prescreening question is, “When did you last have a drink of beer, wine, or liquor?” If the patient reports drinking within the past year, the clinician should ask questions to determine:
• Frequency (“How many days per week do you typically drink alcohol?”)

• Quantity (“How much alcohol do you

drink on a typical drinking occasion?”)

• Evidence of binge drinking (for men: “On any day in the past year, have you ever had five or more drinks?”; for women: “On any day in the past year, have you ever had four or more drinks?”)
The clinician should ask the patient to define what the patient means by “a drink” (e.g.,

an 8-ounce glass, half a glass). The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) defines one drink as one 12-ounce bottle of beer or wine cooler, one 5-ounce glass of wine, or 1.5 ounces of 80-proof dis­ tilled spirits. According to NIAAA (2005), if the male patient drinks more than 4 standard drinks in a day (or more than 14 drinks per

week), or more than 3 drinks in a day (or more than 7 drinks per week) for the female patient, the person is at increased risk for developing alcohol-related problems.
Whether or not the patient reports drinking, the clinician should probe for the use of licit and illicit drugs, starting with the most com­ monly used illicit drug in the United States: marijuana. Questions can continue to address other major classes of drugs with abuse poten­ tial (e.g., depressants, stimulants, opioids),



19

with particular attention to use related to controlling pain or the patient’s anxiety and fear of pain (Passik & Kirsch, 2004). Exhibit

2-5 summarizes the substances that patients should be asked about using.
NIDA provides a Web-based tool that helps clinicians screen for tobacco, alcohol, and illicit and nonmedical prescription drug use, and suggests levels of intervention. The tool is at http://ww1.drugabuse.gov/nmassist.

screening for substance Use

Disorders

Although the amount of substance used is significant, it is more important to evaluate the consequences of the drug and alcohol use on life domains, such as family, work or school, and involvement with the criminal justice system (e.g., arrests for driving under the influence). When drug or alcohol use interferes with normal function, addiction is

likely. Furthermore, addiction is characterized

by impaired ability to control use of the sub­ stance. Asking whether the patient has ever attempted to decrease the amount consumed is an approach to determining his or her abil­

ity to modulate use. In the case of prescription medication, a patient’s loss of control may manifest as the inability to ration pills until

the next prescription, so the patient’s partner may oversee the dispensing of the medications.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2000) provides criteria for determining substance dependence that enable the clinician to distinguish between patients with at-risk substance use and those whose

use is consistent with an SUD (Exhibit 2-6). It is important to remember that, essentially, all patients taking prescribed opioids or seda­ tives on a long-term basis will have a degree of tolerance and withdrawal and that these criteria are not indicative of addiction absent the “maladaptive pattern of substance use.”



exhibit 2-5 Items To Include in substance Use Assessment

20

2—Patient Assessment


exhibit 2-6 Dsm-Iv-Tr criteria for substance Abuse and substance

Dependence


category

criteria

Substance

Abuse

A maladaptive pattern of substance use leading to clinically significant impairment or distress, as manifested by one (or more) of the following, occurring within a 12-month period:
• Recurrent substance use resulting in a failure to fulfill major role obligations

at work, school, or home (e.g., repeated absences or poor work performance related to substance use; substance-related absences, suspensions, or expul­ sions from school; neglect of children or household)

• Recurrent substance use in situations in which it is physically hazardous (e.g., driving an automobile or operating machinery when impaired by substance use)

• Recurrent substance-related legal problems (e.g., arrests for substance- related disorderly conduct)

• Continued substance use despite having persistent or recurrent social or interpersonal problems caused or exacerbated by the effects of the substance (e.g., arguments with spouse about consequences of intoxication, physical fights)

Substance

Dependence

A maladaptive pattern of substance use, leading to clinically significant impairment or distress, as manifested by three (or more) of the following, occurring any time in a 12-month period:
• Tolerance, as defined by either of the following: (a) a need for markedly increased amounts of the substance to achieve intoxication or desired effect, or (b) markedly diminished effect with continued use of the same amount of the substance

• Withdrawal, as manifested by either of the following: (a) the characteristic withdrawal syndrome for the substance, or (b) the same (or closely related) substance is taken to relieve or avoid withdrawal symptoms

• The substance is often taken in larger amounts or over a longer period than intended

• There is a persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control substance use

• A great deal of time is spent in activities necessary to obtain the substance, use the substance, or recover from its effects

• Important social, occupational, or recreational activities are given up or reduced because of substance use

• The substance use is continued despite knowledge of having a persistent physical or psychological problem that is likely to have been caused or exac­ erbated by the substance (e.g., current cocaine use despite recognition of cocaine-induced depression, continued drinking despite recognition that an ulcer was made worse by alcohol consumption)

Reprinted with permission from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision

(Copyright 2000). American Psychiatric Association.
21

Although a patient’s former drug of choice is the one that is most likely to lead to cravings and relapse (Daley, Marlatt, & Spotts, 2003; Gardner, 2000), clinical experience suggests that a person with a history of an SUD involv­ ing any drug is susceptible to developing a cross-addiction with opioids (Covington,

2008; Savage, 2002).
Clinicians should try to determine patients’ recovery status, which is crucial in developing a treatment plan (Exhibit 2-7). Many patients will be forthcoming about past or recent sub­ stance abuse during a comprehensive assess­ ment. Some patients who have an SUD lack

a full appreciation of the effects of substances,

prescribed or otherwise, on their function; however, family members can usually provide this information.
Several standardized tools for SUD screening are listed in Exhibit 2-8. Information on how to obtain the tools is in Appendix B. Most tools are short, can be self-administered, and can be integrated into the health-screening forms the patient completes prior to seeing the clinician. Although no tool is a substitute for a good clinical interview, screening is essential to case finding and a useful comple­ ment to the patient interview, the physical exam, and ongoing observation (Fishman,

2007).



exhibit 2-7 steps Following substance Abuse Assessment


If

Then

Abuse is remote and patient is in long-term recovery

Verify and support recovery efforts

Patient is on buprenorphine or methadone maintenance therapy (MMT)

Verify and continue buprenorphine or MMT

Abuse appears active

Refer patient to substance abuse specialist for further evaluation

Adapted from Passik & Kirsh, 2004.


exhibit 2-8 Tools To screen for substance Use Disorders


Tool

Format

Administration/

scoring Time

Training required

Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test

1 item for lifetime use, 6 items for each of 10 sub- stances used, and 1 item on injection use

Depends on number of substances used

Yes

Alcohol Use Disorders

Identification Test (AUDIT)

10-item screening questionnaire

2 minutes to administer/

1 minute to score

Yes

AUDIT-C

3-item screening questionnaire

Less than 1 minute to administer and score

Yes

CAGE Adapted To Include

Drugs

4 yes/no questions

Less than 1 minute/

not scored

No

Drug Abuse Screening

Test

20 yes/no questions about current and past use

1–2 minutes to administer/

not scored

No

Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST) (MAST-G for older adults)

24 yes/no questions

10 minutes to administer/

5 minutes to score

No


22

2—Patient Assessment



The Substance Abuse and Mental Health

Services Administration’s Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) initiative may be helpful in the primary care context (Exhibit 2-9). More information can be obtained from the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT,

1999a). Research findings on SBIRT are available from National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors (2006).
1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   ...   14

Related:

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconSr doc disclaimer this document file was created by scanning the...

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document icon*The links in this document will only work in the ms word Version....

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document icon*The links in this document will only work in the ms word Version....

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconYou will use the acl pdf document to complete this list of exercises....

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconMime-version: 0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="-=22342405....

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconOS8cktig. Doc os/8 Combined Kit Information Guide disclaimer this...

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconMaclnkum. Doc macrel/link user's Manual Order No. Aa-5664b-ta disclaimer...

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconAdobe® Acrobat® XI pro: Part 2

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconAdobe® Acrobat® Χ Pro: Level 2

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconAdobe® Acrobat® X pro: Level 1

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconCreating Text Based pdf document

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconTo show a document map or index for this document click on “view”...

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconWord Tutorial 2: Editing and Formatting a Document

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document icon**Please fill in the below form in Word and return in a Word doc. Not a pdf**

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconThis document is a text description of the control panel layout for...

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconThis document is a text description of the control panel layout for...

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconThe purpose of this document is to provide you with a guideline for...

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconListed document this document shall not be revised without approval...

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document icon© 2008 Microsoft Corporation. This document is developed prior to...

This Microsoft Word document was converted from an original Adobe Acrobat pdf document iconThis document is the first of two documents in the automated gsa...




manual




When copying material provide a link © 2017
contacts
manual-guide.com
search