Download 0.59 Mb.
|
Radioactive Materials Product Stewardship A Background Report for the National Dialogue on Radioactive Materials Product Stewardship Prepared by the: Product Stewardship Institute University of Massachusetts/Lowell Pinanski Building, Room 303 One University Avenue Lowell, MA 01854 June 11, 2003 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary i 2. Introduction 7 3. Product stewardship 10 3.1 The “Justification” Principle in Radiation Protection 10 3.2 Principles of Product Stewardship 11 3.3 Life Cycle Approach in this Project 12 Device Production, Sale & Use 13 Device Post - Use 13 4. The Environmental and Human Health Hazards 14 4.1 Radionuclides and Nuclear Fixed Gauges 14 4.2 Radionuclides and Tritium Exit Signs 14 4.3 Risk Information 15 4.4 Environmental Incidents in the NMED Database 18 5. Regulatory requirements 25 5.1 Federal Requirements 25 General License Requirements 27 Labeling 28 Annual Registration Requirements for Certain Devices 29 Low Level Waste (LLW) Disposal Regulations 31 5.2 State Requirements and Programs 32 5.3 General License Registrations 33 5.4 Enforcement 36 5.5 Codes/Standards 37 Standards Relevant to Exit Signs 37 Standards Relevant to Nuclear Fixed Gauges 37 Standards Relevant to Cleanup and Exposure 38 5.6 Export/Import 38 Export 39 How Export Actually Works 39 Import 40 Recent Import Initiatives to Enhance Accountability 40 5.7 Summary of Findings 42 6. Manufacturing, Sales, and use 43 6.1 Nuclear Fixed Gauges 43 6.1.1 Product Functionality 43 6.1.2 Product Applications 43 6.1.3 Radioactive Components 43 6.1.4 Major Product Manufacturers 45 6.1.5 Product Costs 45 6.1.6 Major Distribution Channels 46 6.1.7 Quantity Produced/Sold Annually 47 6.1.8 Reuse/Transfer 48 6.1.9 Hazards During Manufacture, Sales and Use 48 6.1.10 Alternative Non-Radioactive Gauge Technologies 49 6.2 Tritium Exit Signs 51 6.2.1 Product Functionality 51 6.2.2 Product Applications 51 6.2.3 Radioactive Components 51 6.2.4 Major Product Manufacturers 52 6.2.5 Product Costs 52 6.2.6 Major Distribution Channels 53 6.2.7 Quantity Produced/Sold Annually 54 6.2.8 Reuse/Transfer 55 6.2.9 Hazards During Manufacture, Sales and Use 55 6.2.10 Alternative Exit Sign Technologies 55 6.3 Summary of Findings 58 Nuclear Fixed Gauges 58 Tritium Exit Signs 59 7. End of Life Management 60 7.1 Current Collection and Disposal Practices 60 Recycling and Reuse of Nuclear Fixed Gauges 60 Recycling and Reuse of Tritium Exit Signs 62 Land Disposal 63 7.2 Radioactive Devices in Solid Waste Streams 67 Waste to Energy Facilities 67 Solid Waste Landfills 67 7.3 Radioactive Materials in Recycled Metals 68 7.4 Management of Orphan Sources 71 7.4.1 “Orphan Source Project” 72 7.4.2 Off-site Source Recovery project at LANL 73 7.4.3 Root Causes 73 7.5 Security 74 7.6 Summary of Findings 75 8. Stakeholder Groups 77 Manufacturers and Distributors 77 Industry Associations 77 Waste Brokers, Recyclers, & Disposal Facilities 78 Government - Federal 78 Government - State 79 Professional Organizations 79 9. Bibliography 80 APPENDIX A: ORGANIZATIONS PROVIDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT 84 Appendix B: Glossary of Terms 86 Appendix C: Radiation Hazards/Conversion Chart 92 Appendix D: SOME Manufacturers and Distributors of Nuclear Gauges/Devices and tritium exit signs 93 Appendix e: SOME Waste Disposal and Source Recovery Vendors 97 Appendix f: Scrap Metal Melting Incidents in the U.S. 98 Table of Figures and Tables Table 1 Summary of Key Issues ii Figure 1. Life Cycle of a Nuclear Fixed Gauge or Tritium Exit Sign 13 14 Table 2. Principal Radioisotopes in nuclear fixed gauges 14 Table 3. Tritium Radioisotope in Self-Luminous Exit Signs 15 Table 4. Whole body total doses from various sources 16 Table 5. Yearly comparison of reportable events for nuclear fixed gauges 20 Table 6. Summary of Incidents for Nuclear Fixed Gauges, 1995 - 2003 20 Table 7. Summary of Incidents for Tritium Exit Signs 21 Figure 2. Documented Tritium Exposures from Four Incidents 23 Table 8. Tritium Exit Sign Incident Costs 23 Figure 3. Contamination Levels from tritium exit sign incidents. 24 Table 9. Role of Major Federal Agencies and Departments 25 Table 10. Regulatory Categories for End Users of Certain Sealed Sources 26 Table 11. History of Regulations and Activities Leading to Enhanced GL Device Registration 29 Figure 4. Map of Agreement and Non-Agreement States 32 Table 12. Estimate of Annual Nuclear Fixed Gauge general license Registrations over the last Twenty Years in All States 34 Table 13. Estimate of Annual Tritium Exit Signs Registrations over the last Twenty Years in All States 35 Table 14. GL Device Registration Information from Massachusetts 36 Table 15. Relevant Radiation Cleanup Standards. 38 Table 16. Industries Using Nuclear Fixed Gauges 44 Figure 5. Nuclear Fixed Gauge Sales Based on Estimated Registrations. 47 Table 17 Emergency Exit Lighting Cost Comparison 53 Figure 6. Tritium Exit Signs as a Function of Estimated Registrations 54 Table 18. Increased Sales of LED Emergency Lighting 57 Table 19. Prices for Sealed Source Return and Transfer 60 Table 20. Waste Broker Estimates of Recycling/Disposal Costs. 61 Table 21. Total Number of Signs Recycled by Two Manufacturers from 2000 to 2002 63 Table 22. Disposal Rates at US Ecology, Inc. Richland, WA. Effective January 1, 2003 65 Table 23. Disposal Rate Schedule for non-Atlantic Compact Waste at Barnwell 66 Table 24. U.S. Reported Meltings (Yusko, 2002) 69 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Product Stewardship Institute wishes to thank the many individuals and organizations who gave their time, energy and information to the development of this report. We are grateful to the representatives from nuclear fixed gauge and tritium exit sign manufacturers and distributors, industry associations, waste brokers, recyclers and disposal facilities, federal government agencies, state agencies and professional organizations. All individuals and organizations providing assistance are listed by name in Appendix A. The principal authors of this report are Gregory J. Morose from the Product Stewardship Institute and Thomas P. Balf from Nexus Environmental Partners. We also wish to acknowledge the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for their financial support of this project. |
search |